<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sorting large amps based on their micro-dynamic capability</title>
	<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653</link>
	<description>The pursuit of the ultimate music experiences using extreme high-end audio</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sorting large amps based on their micro-dynamic capability by: blog commenting service</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-4309</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-4309</guid>
					<description>analog and Tubes we find better result at lower cost and it help audiophiles have better result with lower cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>analog and Tubes we find better result at lower cost and it help audiophiles have better result with lower cost.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sorting large amps based on their micro-dynamic capability by: LEACH26Lynda</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-4194</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-4194</guid>
					<description>Some time before, I needed to buy a house for my business but I didn't have enough cash and couldn't order anything. Thank God my dude suggested to take the &lt;a href=&quot;http://goodfinance-blog.com/topics/credit-loans&quot;&gt;credit loans&lt;/a&gt; from trustworthy creditors. Thence, I acted so and was satisfied with my short term loan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Some time before, I needed to buy a house for my business but I didn&#8217;t have enough cash and couldn&#8217;t order anything. Thank God my dude suggested to take the <a href="http://goodfinance-blog.com/topics/credit-loans">credit loans</a> from trustworthy creditors. Thence, I acted so and was satisfied with my short term loan.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sorting large amps based on their micro-dynamic capability by: mehrdad</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3347</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3347</guid>
					<description>Thank you Mike
This kind of sorting is very helpful. many of us maybe don't hearing 
all of this amps ,  but this list could help to find an  idea about some
brands .
For this it would be so nice if this lists will be moor complete &amp;#38; expand .
The best wishes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thank you Mike<br />
This kind of sorting is very helpful. many of us maybe don&#8217;t hearing<br />
all of this amps ,  but this list could help to find an  idea about some<br />
brands .<br />
For this it would be so nice if this lists will be moor complete &amp; expand .<br />
The best wishes
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sorting large amps based on their micro-dynamic capability by: Amir</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3346</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3346</guid>
					<description>Dear Mike
now or maybe at the first time I try to define subjective vectors that we define sounds exactly on it's coordinate, maybe impossible but i try. i think we need a complete and common language for our ideas. I hope this try make us more familiar.
at first I define two thing, macro linearity and micro linearity then try to categorize all subjective parameters in this two field.
for start I have four windows for viewing sound:
1. presence of sound in space
2. harmonic structure
3. dynamic structure
4. transparency and neutrality for this 3 windows

just i need time and it's not in my hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dear Mike<br />
now or maybe at the first time I try to define subjective vectors that we define sounds exactly on it&#8217;s coordinate, maybe impossible but i try. i think we need a complete and common language for our ideas. I hope this try make us more familiar.<br />
at first I define two thing, macro linearity and micro linearity then try to categorize all subjective parameters in this two field.<br />
for start I have four windows for viewing sound:<br />
1. presence of sound in space<br />
2. harmonic structure<br />
3. dynamic structure<br />
4. transparency and neutrality for this 3 windows</p>
	<p>just i need time and it&#8217;s not in my hands.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sorting large amps based on their micro-dynamic capability by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3339</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3339</guid>
					<description>Hi Mehrdad,

Ah, the ASR.

I'll have to  put it in the list in the other post's comments thread - or maybe it is  time for a  new one. You know, the ASR does not score all that well in terms of dynamics [it is kind of laid back] and harmonics is  just  average. Thinking about what makes the ASR a decent amp for many people made me realize that  we need another list for the amps:

Bad Behavior:

Many of the amps  on the list have some kind of bad behavior: brightness or extreme dullness, tendency to catch on fire [I joke! ... kind of :-)], or whatever - and the ASR does not. 

We'll have to add this bad behavior list to the lists.... This amp choosing business is so  complex... luckily it is fun too!

Thanks,
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Mehrdad,</p>
	<p>Ah, the ASR.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;ll have to  put it in the list in the other post&#8217;s comments thread - or maybe it is  time for a  new one. You know, the ASR does not score all that well in terms of dynamics [it is kind of laid back] and harmonics is  just  average. Thinking about what makes the ASR a decent amp for many people made me realize that  we need another list for the amps:</p>
	<p>Bad Behavior:</p>
	<p>Many of the amps  on the list have some kind of bad behavior: brightness or extreme dullness, tendency to catch on fire [I joke! &#8230; kind of <img src='http://audiofederation.com/blog/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ], or whatever - and the ASR does not. </p>
	<p>We&#8217;ll have to add this bad behavior list to the lists&#8230;. This amp choosing business is so  complex&#8230; luckily it is fun too!</p>
	<p>Thanks,<br />
Mike
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sorting large amps based on their micro-dynamic capability by: mehrdad</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3334</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3334</guid>
					<description>Hi everybody
Mike ,may i ask ,where is the  ASR  place ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi everybody<br />
Mike ,may i ask ,where is the  ASR  place ?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sorting large amps based on their micro-dynamic capability by: Amir</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3319</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3319</guid>
					<description>I correct:
with analog and digital we find better result at lower cost and it help audiophiles have better result with lower cost.

to:
with analog and Tubes we find better result at lower cost and it help audiophiles have better result with lower cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I correct:<br />
with analog and digital we find better result at lower cost and it help audiophiles have better result with lower cost.</p>
	<p>to:<br />
with analog and Tubes we find better result at lower cost and it help audiophiles have better result with lower cost.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sorting large amps based on their micro-dynamic capability by: Amir</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3318</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3318</guid>
					<description>a good link from pass labs for describing Class A Class A/B:
http://www.hifi.ir/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/leaving_class_a.pdf

I agree mike that many Class A/B amplifiers are better than Class A amplifiers.

a good approach should have good results even in wide implementing range and not in a narrow range.

I think solidstate and digital technology in comparison with tube and analog technology have narrower range and for implementing good result from them we should pay more care and cost and the final result is not as good as state of the art.
with analog and digital we find better result at lower cost and it help audiophiles have better result with lower cost.
it's interesting that you see over 70k$ digital source and over 130k$ solidstate amplifier!!!!

I do not why industry replaced tube with transistor or replaced analog with digital but I hope Audio industry find correct direction.

regards
Amir</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>a good link from pass labs for describing Class A Class A/B:<br />
<a href='http://www.hifi.ir/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/leaving_class_a.pdf'>http://www.hifi.ir/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/leaving_class_a.pdf</a></p>
	<p>I agree mike that many Class A/B amplifiers are better than Class A amplifiers.</p>
	<p>a good approach should have good results even in wide implementing range and not in a narrow range.</p>
	<p>I think solidstate and digital technology in comparison with tube and analog technology have narrower range and for implementing good result from them we should pay more care and cost and the final result is not as good as state of the art.<br />
with analog and digital we find better result at lower cost and it help audiophiles have better result with lower cost.<br />
it&#8217;s interesting that you see over 70k$ digital source and over 130k$ solidstate amplifier!!!!</p>
	<p>I do not why industry replaced tube with transistor or replaced analog with digital but I hope Audio industry find correct direction.</p>
	<p>regards<br />
Amir
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sorting large amps based on their micro-dynamic capability by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3314</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3314</guid>
					<description>Hi Roscoeiii,

I think what Amir is saying is that it is defacto true that the biggest amps seem to suffer when it comes to micro-dynamics - and what I am saying is that I see no 'technological' reason for  this to always be the case.

I think the expensive class A/B amps sound better than the inexpensive' class A amps... a lot depends on the attention to detail than manufacturer put  into the amp. In other words, it is not about the technology used,IMHO, but how the amp actually sounds - and that  depends on many, many factors: the particular design used, chassis, wiring, components...

Re: the sound of this particular system with Pass Labs and Feastrex drivers -  it  was just an example of what solid-state can do, tonally, in a very narrow range (and in a system quite compromised from my point of view with respect to associated equipment). From what I understand, these drivers are very easy to drive and cost about $20-$30K per pair. The point is that solid-state amps, if  they could drive more common drivers correctly, might have a pleasant purity that might counter some of their more problematic issues.

Re: auditioning. It is all about the speaker/amp pairing - and your preferences and tolerances of  course. Unless you are looking at the better Audio Note amps or the Lamm ML3, you need to pick the amp that is best for your speaker - given your  budget and tolerances for things like bass being a little weak or tone being a little washed out versus preferences like preferring an uncompressed midrange or loving that sense of 'air', for example.

These lists are somewhat esoteric, and perhaps  we need to start a parallel disucssion on Best Amp for a Speaker. For example, the VTL scores low on many of the lists [and will in the future lists] but paired with the Sound Lab speakers [which have micro-dynamics out the yin yang but are quite hard to drive] they make a great pair for  someone who  likes the tube sound on the SoundLabs [which is  very, very nice and very different from the solid-state sound on the SoundLabs - which is  nice too (with a decent amp... NOT the Parasound please... try Sanders), of course, but  somewhat more ethereal].

OK. Sentences too long there, but...
Thanks for your  questions,
Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Roscoeiii,</p>
	<p>I think what Amir is saying is that it is defacto true that the biggest amps seem to suffer when it comes to micro-dynamics - and what I am saying is that I see no &#8216;technological&#8217; reason for  this to always be the case.</p>
	<p>I think the expensive class A/B amps sound better than the inexpensive&#8217; class A amps&#8230; a lot depends on the attention to detail than manufacturer put  into the amp. In other words, it is not about the technology used,IMHO, but how the amp actually sounds - and that  depends on many, many factors: the particular design used, chassis, wiring, components&#8230;</p>
	<p>Re: the sound of this particular system with Pass Labs and Feastrex drivers -  it  was just an example of what solid-state can do, tonally, in a very narrow range (and in a system quite compromised from my point of view with respect to associated equipment). From what I understand, these drivers are very easy to drive and cost about $20-$30K per pair. The point is that solid-state amps, if  they could drive more common drivers correctly, might have a pleasant purity that might counter some of their more problematic issues.</p>
	<p>Re: auditioning. It is all about the speaker/amp pairing - and your preferences and tolerances of  course. Unless you are looking at the better Audio Note amps or the Lamm ML3, you need to pick the amp that is best for your speaker - given your  budget and tolerances for things like bass being a little weak or tone being a little washed out versus preferences like preferring an uncompressed midrange or loving that sense of &#8216;air&#8217;, for example.</p>
	<p>These lists are somewhat esoteric, and perhaps  we need to start a parallel disucssion on Best Amp for a Speaker. For example, the VTL scores low on many of the lists [and will in the future lists] but paired with the Sound Lab speakers [which have micro-dynamics out the yin yang but are quite hard to drive] they make a great pair for  someone who  likes the tube sound on the SoundLabs [which is  very, very nice and very different from the solid-state sound on the SoundLabs - which is  nice too (with a decent amp&#8230; NOT the Parasound please&#8230; try Sanders), of course, but  somewhat more ethereal].</p>
	<p>OK. Sentences too long there, but&#8230;<br />
Thanks for your  questions,<br />
Mike.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sorting large amps based on their micro-dynamic capability by: roscoeiii</title>
		<link>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3313</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://audiofederation.com/blog/archives/653#comment-3313</guid>
					<description>Can you say some more about how the power of an amp in general relates to micro- and macrodynamics (assuming that they are paired with suitably sensitive speakers of course)? 

And what about the differences in Class A vs Class A/B? You mentioned a low-powered Pass being solid state in the right direction? I'm assuming that this would be a Class A amp? 

A nice discussion and useful lists, particularly for helping folks narrow down what brands they might want to audition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Can you say some more about how the power of an amp in general relates to micro- and macrodynamics (assuming that they are paired with suitably sensitive speakers of course)? </p>
	<p>And what about the differences in Class A vs Class A/B? You mentioned a low-powered Pass being solid state in the right direction? I&#8217;m assuming that this would be a Class A amp? </p>
	<p>A nice discussion and useful lists, particularly for helping folks narrow down what brands they might want to audition.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

